Up coming, i determined the potential connection ranging from these details and you will sociocultural factors, by carrying out Chisquared evaluating

Written by

Up coming, i determined the potential connection ranging from these details and you will sociocultural factors, by carrying out Chisquared evaluating

In order to examine our 2nd hypothesis, we earliest recoded, for every single of the things that into the condition scale, the fresh part of responses that show if husbands reduce, seniorblackpeoplemeet equal or even more ratings, particularly, status, which have hypogamy, which means that husbands has all the way down condition than wives, homogamy, meaning equal updates, and you will hypergamy, definition husbands with large condition than just wives. Toward possible relationship out of country, analyses were high from inside the studies (X dos =11.9; df=2; p=.003; n=.20), and you can financial feeling out-of a potential divorce (X dos =9.51; df=2; p=.009; n=.18). Data revealed that, to possess Foreign language players, there’s way more training hypogamy, whereas having Dominican professionals there’s more training homogamy. Towards monetary items in case there are divorce, because there is so much more homogamy getting Foreign-language people, discover way more hypergamy to have Dominicans (discover Figure step one).

With previous failed marriages or otherwise not wasn’t related to help you differences in position. Towards prospective connection ranging from updates and you can decades married, tall relationships was found in wellness (X dos =14.7; df=4; p=.005; n=.16), and even though to have couples y is out there (forty.4%, each), to own partners y exists (43.4%). Simply put, toward classification with increased ages hitched, husbands keeps down wellness condition. Having children out of previous failed marriages and having students out-of current matrimony didn’t somewhat apply at updates.

From inside the contribution, the latest analyses concerning second hypothesis revealed that as opposed to all of our standards, the most significant feature related so you can standing is the nation.

Univariate evaluating found high differences in grounds 1 (F=5

To contrast our third hypothesis, that predict that homogamy will be associated to higher marital satisfaction for both countries, we have estimated the scores in ong the three types of status (hypogamy, homogamy, and hypergamy) for the seven items of the scale. The analyses revealed significant differences in bda=.951, F(6, 584)= 2.47; p<.05]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 2 of marital satisfaction (F=4.54; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.01), with no significant differences by country. Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypergamy in health status have significantly smaller y situations (M=4.14, SE=0.11; and M=4.57, SE=0.10, respectively).

Also, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on education status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.938, F(6, 584)= 3.17; p<.01]. 46; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.03), and total scale (F=3.61; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.XX). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.04), as well as by the interaction of status by country (F=4.90; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.03). Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypogamic education status situations have significantly smaller ic situations (M=4.18, SE=0.11; and M=4.58, SE=0.11, respectively). In addition, hypergamy situations in Spain and Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain. Homogamy situations in Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain.

Fundamentally, hypogamy points in the Spain obtained somewhat less than hypogamy factors in the Dominican Republic

Likewise, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on economic status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.937, F(6, 584)= 3.21; p<.01]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=6.64; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.04). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.03), with Dominicans scoring significantly higher than Spaniards (M=4.8, SE=.015, and M=4.34, SE=.10, respectively). Economic hypergamy was associated to significantly higher ic and hypogamic status. Spaniards with hypergamy status scored significantly higher than the other two groups from Spain. Dominicans with hypogamic status scored significantly lower than the other two groups from the same country.

Additionally, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on housekeeping status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.920, F(6, 584)= 4.12; p<.001]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=; df=2; p<.001; h 2 =.06), and total scale (F=6.84; df=2; p=.001; h 2 =.04), without significant differences by country. Hypogamy status was associated to significantly higher y status (M=4.88, SE=.14, M=4.34, SE=.07, respectively).

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *